Wars don’t just redraw maps; they rewrite the rules of global power. The future of Ukraine will be shaped not just by military battles, but by decisions made in Washington, Moscow, and Kyiv over the coming months.
The US President is promising to end the war, but Russia’s President Vladimir Putin will not yield so easily.
Behind the talk of ceasefires and negotiations, a new battle over Ukraine’s vast reserves of minerals is also playing out.
The outcome of this war will determine whether Ukraine becomes a strong, independent state aligned with the West or if it is permanently weakened, its territory and resources carved up between Russia and its adversaries.
Is Trump’s Ukraine strategy changing?
Donald Trump campaigned on the idea that he could end the Ukraine war quickly, even suggesting he would negotiate a deal “on day one.”
But his team is now admitting that a resolution will take months or longer.
His advisors have moved away from unrealistic promises and are now discussing a possible cease-fire that freezes the battlefield, removes Ukraine’s NATO ambitions and creates an economic deal that could benefit the US.
Trump’s latest comments suggest he is considering using Ukraine’s mineral wealth as leverage.
He has floated the idea that continued US aid could come in exchange for access to Ukraine’s critical materials, something Washington has been exploring for years.
The US has long worried about China’s dominance in rare earth minerals. China controls 85% of global refining capacity.
If Ukraine’s resources can be secured, they could serve as an alternative supply chain for the West, reducing reliance on China.
However, Trump’s assumption that Russia will accept a deal quickly appears misplaced.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has little incentive to stop now. His forces are still making territorial gains, and he knows Trump’s presidency is temporary.
He may prefer to wait, calculating that Western support for Ukraine could weaken over time.
Russia is playing the long game
Putin’s strategy has always been bigger than just territorial conquest. According to some estimates, Russia has already seized 33% of Ukraine’s known critical mineral deposits, estimated to be worth at least $5–$8 trillion.
This includes some of Europe’s largest reserves of lithium and titanium. These two materials are essential for battery production, aerospace, and military applications.
If Russia captures more of Ukraine’s resource-rich territories, it will control a massive share of the world’s future industrial supply chains.
However, Russia’s economy is running on fumes. But despite sanctions by the West, Moscow has managed to keep its war machine running by shifting trade to China, India, and other non-Western partners.
Oil exports continue to generate revenue, but with lowered prices.
While inflation is rising and the ruble has weakened, the Russian economy still has some oil left in the tank.
This means Putin has time to wait and push for more gains before negotiating.
There is also the risk of a renewed offensive. Some experts believe Russia may launch a major attack before serious peace talks begin.
If Putin can capture more Ukrainian territory, he will strengthen his bargaining position. This makes any near-term diplomatic resolution unlikely.
What does Ukraine’s future look like?
Ukraine is not giving up, and its resilience has been surprising.
Despite manpower shortages, it has adapted to the war by ramping up domestic arms production.
Ukrainian factories are now producing millions of drones annually and developing new weapons technologies.
This means that even if Western military aid slows down, Ukraine will still have the capability to resist Russian advances.
Economically, Ukraine is performing better than many expected. Growth has returned, and Kyiv is building stronger trade relationships with Europe.
While Russia hoped Ukraine’s economy would collapse under the pressure of war, the opposite is happening. Ukraine is integrating more closely with the West.
The long-term question is whether Ukraine will follow a model similar to Finland after World War II.
Finland lost land to the Soviet Union and pledged neutrality, but it remained independent and gradually moved closer to the West.
If Ukraine is forced to accept territorial losses and stay out of NATO, it could still develop into a strong, economically viable state.
Over time, it could build closer security ties with Europe, even without formal NATO membership.
What happens if Russia-Ukraine peace talks fail?
If peace talks stall, the conflict will likely grind on in its current form, that is a slow war of attrition.
This would keep the global economy on edge, with ongoing disruptions to energy markets, grain exports, and industrial supply chains.
A prolonged war also increases the risk of financial strain on Ukraine’s Western backers.
The US has already committed over $150 billion to Ukraine’s defense, and some European countries are questioning how long they can sustain their contributions.
There are also implications for investors here. If Russia consolidates its gains, it could tighten control over global supply chains for key minerals, putting Western industries at risk.
If Ukraine manages to stabilize and rebuild, it could become a major economic partner for Europe, with its critical resources helping to drive the next generation of technology and manufacturing.
The next few months will be decisive. If the US and Europe want Ukraine to emerge as a strong and independent state, they must be prepared to offer more than just military aid.
Long-term economic support, investment in Ukraine’s mining sector, and stronger security commitments will be needed. If they hesitate, Russia may continue its slow but steady expansion, reshaping the global balance of power in the process.
The post The endless war for power, territory and resources: What does the future hold for Ukraine? appeared first on Invezz
