The US has just entered its 22nd day without a functioning federal government.
This is the 2nd longest US government shutdown on record, trailing only 2018-2019, which was 35 days during Donald Trump’s first term in office.
Paychecks are frozen, airports are short-staffed, and key programs are running on borrowed time. At the same time, markets have barely flinched.
Investors seem to assume Washington’s dysfunction is temporary.
The situation seems calm on the surface, but this shutdown is exposing how the machinery of government, and by extension, parts of the economy that depend on it, has become hostage to political strategy rather than governance.
Why this US government shutdown is different
This impasse began just after midnight on October 1, when Congress failed to agree on a new budget.
Unlike past shutdowns driven by disputes over spending levels or fiscal limits, this one is unfolding even though both parties broadly accept last year’s budget framework.
Since then, around 750,000 federal employees have been told to stay home, while hundreds of thousands more are currently working without pay.
President Donald Trump says he will meet Democratic leaders only once the government is reopened.
Democrats say reopening must include an extension of subsidies under the Affordable Care Act that are set to expire at the end of the year.
That single disagreement has paralyzed the entire nation. Democrats argue that allowing the subsidies to lapse would raise health-insurance costs for roughly 24 million Americans during open enrollment, which starts November 1.
Republicans want to treat the issue separately, calling it a policy negotiation that should not be tied to the federal budget.
It is a fight that mirrors the new logic of divided government. Both sides have learned from past shutdowns that whoever blinks first tends to lose leverage.
The result is a prolonged standoff in which practical governance stops while each side waits for public pressure to subside.
When services stop, consequences spread
Although essential operations continue, the edges of the system are fraying. The Federal Aviation Administration confirmed on October 21 that staffing shortages have begun delaying flights in Houston and Newark.
About 12% of departures at Houston’s main airport were late that day, along with 15% in Newark. Those are early warning signs.
The 2019 shutdown ended abruptly when air-traffic controllers called in sick, and a short FAA ground stop at New York’s LaGuardia Airport forced a deal within hours.
Officials are trying to prevent a repeat, but the pattern feels familiar. Political stalemates often end only when disruption becomes visible to the public.
At the same time, food aid programs are running out of money. The Department of Agriculture has said there may not be enough to cover November benefits under SNAP, the largest US nutrition program.
State agencies are already warning families to prepare for possible gaps.
In the Defense Department, about half of the civilian employees are furloughed.
Active-duty troops are being paid under a special order signed by the president, but civilian staff handling maintenance, procurement, and logistics are not. The Pentagon is operating with one hand tied.
These are not abstract issues. They affect local economies that rely on government paychecks and contracts.
Each week without pay compresses household budgets, dampens consumption, and erodes confidence in areas built around federal employment.
How is the economy affected?
Economists typically estimate a weekly hit of around 0.1% to quarterly GDP growth during a broad shutdown.
The White House has circulated higher figures, up to $15 billion in lost output per week. But private forecasters put the number closer to $7 billion.
The math is straightforward. When federal workers miss paychecks, spending pauses. Contractors delay projects. Small firms that depend on government clients cut hours.
Some of the lost output is recouped once pay is restored, but not all. The Congressional Budget Office’s review of 2019 found that about one-quarter of the lost GDP was never recovered.
More subtle are the data blind spots. The government produces key economic indicators used by the Federal Reserve and financial markets.
If agencies cannot collect or publish those numbers, investors and policymakers are flying blind.
That uncertainty raises the risk premium on everything from Treasury yields to corporate borrowing costs.
So far, markets are unbothered. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite are still hovering near record highs.
And history shows that more than half of past shutdowns saw stock gains during the closure. The logic is that shutdowns are temporary political events, not systemic shocks.
Source: Edward Jones
What the standoff tells us about American politics
This shutdown exposes how policy disputes have evolved into tools of leverage. The federal budget is now a stage for ideological confrontation.
By tying funding to policy demands, both parties weaponize the process.
The conflict is almost entirely about policy conditions. Specifically, whether to include an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies in the same bill that reopens the government.
This makes it a test of political leverage rather than financial restraint, showing how gridlock can now occur even when the money itself isn’t in question.
The Democrats’ insistence on binding ACA subsidies to the budget reflects how they view health insurance as part of the fiscal architecture, not a side issue.
The Republicans’ refusal to negotiate before reopening reflects a strategy to separate governance from reform. Neither position is irrational. Both are tactical responses to previous defeats.
But the outcome is paralysis. Each side believes it has more to lose by compromising than by waiting. The country becomes collateral.
There is also a regional element to this shutdown that previous ones lacked.
Reports that roughly $28 billion in federal projects have been paused or canceled in Democratic-leaning states underline how political geography now shapes budget pain.
Federal spending is not only a macroeconomic tool but a political one.
The longer view
Investors may be calm, but policymakers know time is running out.
If the shutdown drags on until early November, missing paychecks will ripple through consumer spending, open enrollment will begin without subsidy clarity, and travel demand will rise into a partially staffed aviation network.
History suggests that the shutdown will end not through persuasion but through pressure, only when disruption becomes impossible to ignore.
The only question is which pressure point arrives first. That’s either financial markets, airports, or voters.
The post Why this US government shutdown is testing the limits of its economy appeared first on Invezz
